From ffc58558a592876145ee3832e8e812735f0edd84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amie Brendel Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:53:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add How our Brains Make Recollections --- How-our-Brains-Make-Recollections.md | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 How-our-Brains-Make-Recollections.md diff --git a/How-our-Brains-Make-Recollections.md b/How-our-Brains-Make-Recollections.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b6ae6d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/How-our-Brains-Make-Recollections.md @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +
Sitting at a sidewalk café in Montreal on a sunny morning, Karim Nader recalls the day eight years earlier when two planes slammed into the twin towers of the World Commerce Heart. He lights a cigarette and waves his arms in the air to sketch the scene. On the time of the attack, [Memory Wave Program](https://www.ebersbach.org/index.php?title=Memory_Hierarchy_And_Entry_Time_-_Sand_Software_Program_And_Sound) Nader was a postdoctoral researcher at New [York College](https://www.deviantart.com/search?q=York%20College). He flipped the radio on while getting able to go to work and Memory Wave heard the banter of the morning disc jockeys flip panicky as they associated the occasions unfolding in Decrease Manhattan. Nader ran to the roof of his condominium building, where he had a view of the towers less than two miles away. He stood there, [Memory Wave](https://hufaconcept.com.tr/blog/wool-jackets) stunned, as they burned and fell, pondering to himself, "No way, man. In the next days, Nader recalls, he handed by way of subway stations where partitions have been lined with notes and pictures left by people looking desperately for lacking cherished ones. "It was like walking upstream in a river of sorrow," he says.
+ +
Like hundreds of thousands of people, Nader has vivid and emotional memories of the September 11, 2001, attacks and their aftermath. However as an skilled on memory, and, particularly, on the malleability of memory, he knows better than to totally belief his recollections. Most people have so-called flashbulb reminiscences of where they have been and what they have been doing when something momentous occurred: the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, say, or the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger. However as clear and detailed as these recollections feel, psychologists find they're surprisingly inaccurate. Nader, now a neuroscientist at McGill University in Montreal, says his memory of the World Commerce Center assault has performed a couple of methods on him. He recalled seeing television footage on September eleven of the first aircraft hitting the north tower of the World Trade Center. But he was stunned to learn that such footage aired for the primary time the following day. Apparently he wasn’t alone: a 2003 examine of 569 school college students discovered that seventy three p.c shared this misperception.
+ +
Nader believes he could have an evidence for such quirks of memory. His concepts are unconventional inside neuroscience, and they've caused researchers to rethink a few of their most fundamental assumptions about how memory works. Briefly, Nader believes that the very act of remembering can change our recollections. A lot of his research is on rats, but he says the identical fundamental ideas apply to human memory as effectively. In fact, he says, it may be unimaginable for humans or another animal to bring a memory to mind with out altering it ultimately. Nader thinks it’s probably that some sorts of memory, resembling a flashbulb memory, are more inclined to vary than others. Recollections surrounding a major event like September eleven may be particularly inclined, he says, as a result of we are inclined to replay them again and again in our minds and in conversation with others-with every repetition having the potential to alter them.
+ +
For those of us who cherish our memories and like to assume they're an correct document of our history, the concept that memory is fundamentally malleable is more than slightly disturbing. Not all researchers imagine Nader has proved that the strategy of remembering itself can alter recollections. But when he is correct, it is probably not a wholly dangerous thing. It'd even be doable to place the phenomenon to good use to scale back the suffering of individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder, who're plagued by recurring memories of occasions they wish they may put behind them. Nader was born in Cairo, Egypt. His Coptic Christian household faced persecution at the hands of Arab nationalists and fled to Canada in 1970, when he was 4 years previous. Many relations additionally made the journey, so many that Nader’s girlfriend teases him in regards to the "soundtrack of a thousand kisses" at massive family gatherings as people bestow customary greetings.
+ +
He attended college and graduate college at the University of Toronto, and in 1996 joined the new York College lab of Joseph LeDoux, a distinguished neuroscientist who research how feelings affect [Memory Wave Program](https://humanlove.stream/wiki/User:MadisonGilman49). "One of the things that actually [seduced](https://www.blogrollcenter.com/?s=seduced) me about science is that it’s a system you can use to test your individual ideas about how things work," Nader says. Even probably the most cherished ideas in a given discipline are open to question. Scientists have lengthy known that recording a memory requires adjusting the connections between neurons. Every memory tweaks some tiny subset of the neurons within the mind (the human mind has a hundred billion neurons in all), changing the way in which they talk. Neurons ship messages to each other throughout narrow gaps referred to as synapses. A synapse is like a bustling port, complete with machinery for sending and receiving cargo-neurotransmitters, specialised chemicals that convey alerts between neurons. All of the delivery machinery is built from proteins, the fundamental constructing blocks of cells.
\ No newline at end of file